מעודכן ל: 4.4.2022
גישור בגירושין
גישור
ניהול סכסוכים
family mediation
alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
dispute resolution methods
Family alternative dispute resolution
חוק בית המשפט לעניני משפחה, תשנ"ה-1995, ס"ח 1537.
חוק בתי המשפט [נוסח משולב], תשמ"ד-1984, ס"ח 1123.
דוד סילורה ועלמה שרון גישור – מדריך מעשי – אזרחי, עבודה, משפחה (2018).
ורד דשא מערכת המשפט בישראל שער תשיעי (2019).
Alternative Dispute Resolution in 5 Fam. L. & Prac. §§ 55.01-55.14 (Arnold H. Rutkin, ed.) (MB) Lexis (database updated Nov. 2021). (search: 5 Family Law and Practice § 55.01).
Divorced from Reality: Rethinking Family Dispute Resolution by
Over the past thirty years, there has been a dramatic shift in the way the legal system approaches and resolves family disputes. Traditionally, family law dispute resolution was based on an “adversary” system: two parties and their advocates stood before a judge who determined which party was at fault in a divorce and who would be awarded the rights in a custody dispute. Now, many family courts are opting for a “problem-solving” model in which courts attempt to resolve both legal and non-legal issues. At the same time, American families have changed dramatically. Divorce rates have leveled off and begun to drop, while the number of children born and raised outside of marriage has increased sharply. Fathers are more likely to seek an active role in their children’s lives. While this enhanced paternal involvement benefits children, it also increases the likelihood of disputes between parents. As a result, the families who seek legal dispute resolution have become more diverse and their legal situations more complex. In Divorced from Reality, Jane C. Murphy and Jana B. Singer argue that the current "problem solving" model fails to address the realities of today's families. The authors suggest that while today’s dispute resolution regime may represent an improvement over its more adversary predecessor, it is built largely around the model of a divorcing nuclear family with lawyers representing all parties—a model that fits poorly with the realities of today's disputing families. To serve the families it is meant to help, the legal system must adapt and reshape itself.
Digital Family Justice From Alternative Dispute Resolution to Online Dispute Resolution? by
The editors' earlier book Delivering Family Justice in the 21st Century (2016) described a period of turbulence in family justice arising from financial austerity. Governments across the world have sought to reduce public spending on private quarrels by promoting mediation (ADR) and by beginning to look at digital justice (ODR) as alternatives to courts and lawyers.
But this book describes how mediation has failed to take the place of courts and lawyers, even where public funding for legal help has been removed. Instead ODR has developed rapidly, led by the Dutch Rechtwijzer. The authors question the speed of this development, and stress the need for careful evaluation of how far these services can meet the needs of divorcing families.
In this book, experts from Canada, Australia, Turkey, Spain, Germany, France, Poland, Scotland, and England and Wales explore how ADR has fallen behind, and how we have learned from the rise and fall of ODR in the Rechtwijzer about what digital justice can and cannot achieve. Managing procedure and process? Yes. Dispute resolution? Not yet.
The authors end by raising broader questions about the role of a family justice system: is it dispute resolution? Or dispute prevention, management, and above all legal protection of the vulnerable?
דורית אלדר-אבידן "בין רווחה למשפט: המקרה של יחידות הסיוע שליד בתי המשפט לענייני משפחה" העצמה במשפט 371 (מימי איזנשטט, גיא מונדלק, רונן זיו וענבל מימון-בלאו 2008).
דפנה לביא "אלימות וגישור: האמנם אוקסימורון?" משפחה במשפט 1, 117 (2007).
רינה בוגוש ורות הלפרין קדרי "הקול קול הגישור, אך הידיים ידי המשפט: על גישור ועל ניהול גירושין בישראל" הפרקליט מט 293 (תשס"ז-תשס"ח).
4 Am. Jur. 2d Alternative Dispute Resolution: Arbitration of Family Disputes § 32, Westlaw (database updated Nov. 2021). (search: 4 Am. Jur. 2d Alternative Dispute Resolution § 32).
מעודכן ל: 4.4.2022
כל האזכורים של מקורות יש לאזכר לפי כללי האזכור האחיד והבלובוק. סרטוני הדרכה על אזכור חקיקה ופסיקה.
|
